The Joel on Software Discussion Group (CLOSED)A place to discuss Joel on Software. Now closed. |
||
|
This community works best when people use their real names. Please
register for a free account.
Other Groups: Joel on Software Business of Software Design of Software (CLOSED) .NET Questions (CLOSED) TechInterview.org CityDesk FogBugz Fog Creek Copilot The Old Forum Your hosts: Albert D. Kallal Li-Fan Chen Stephen Jones |
Hello All,
I'm looking for recommendations for software to do incremental backups for files on a Windows 2003 server. I'm not looking for drive imaging. There is a backup system already in place, but it's just silly and I want to replace it with something that makes sense. The backups will be for web sites and database backups. I checked this: http://www.donationcoder.com/Reviews/Archive/BackUpGuide/index.html And Genie Backup Manager Pro looks good. But I've also heard very good things about Second Copy. The requirements are: * File based backups (i.e. Not drive imaging) * Incremental backups * Reliable (of course) * Runs on a server (can be a Windows scheduled task but preferably a Windows service) * File versioning backups (store changed versions for rollbacks) Nice features that aren't necessarily required: * Backup to network (over LAN or FTP) Can anyone recommend a tool that they've found works well?
Amazon S3 would be good for afterwards, but I want to back things up locally first then worry about getting it off the server. Better to have backups immediately available rather than fart around downloading them first -- that kind of thing.
Oh - and laptop hard drives never crash. Their batteries explode first! =)
Second Copy is good. SyncBack is also good.
They both meet *my* primary requirements. - Both versioning ("keep last x versions") and ability to store long-term backups (e.g. weekly/monthly snapshots) through profiles. - FTP because if a virus hits, or the building burns down an onsite backup is the same as no backup. - Encryption because the files will be stored on a 3rd party FTP server. I use SyncBack because it had a few features that Second Copy didn't have at the time I evaluated it, but looking at them now, they seem roughly equivalent.
Allen David Tuesday, February 05, 2008
Take a look at Backup4all http://www.backup4all.com too:
* File based backups - YES * Incremental backups - YES * Reliable (of course) - YES * Runs on a server (can be a Windows scheduled task but preferably a Windows service) - YES as a scheduled task * File versioning backups (store changed versions for rollbacks) - YES * Backup to network (over LAN or FTP) - YES One thing you have to take into account is the use of proprietary/non-proprietary formats, Backup4all uses standard zip (as I think Second Copy/Syncback use too) but Genie has its own format.
Thank-you for those recommendations. I'll make sure to check them all out. (If there are any more, I'm still open.)
Since you have a windows 2003 server - I would start with Shadow copy for the file versioning.
You could use the built-in backup service in Windows 2003 server to run incremental backups. Not a husge fan, but it works on the cheap. Then you can go for Continuous Data Protection Manager or Backup Exec for the off-server backup for disk to disk to tape backup.
I've had Cobian Backup - http://www.educ.umu.se/~cobian/cobianbackup.htm - running on multiple Win2K3 servers for a couple of years. Seems to do a very good job. It's gone through some changes in who's owning development lately, but I think it's emerging intact. And the price is right.
Donnie Hale Tuesday, February 05, 2008 |
|
Powered by FogBugz


