The Joel on Software Discussion Group (CLOSED)A place to discuss Joel on Software. Now closed. |
||
|
This community works best when people use their real names. Please
register for a free account.
Other Groups: Joel on Software Business of Software Design of Software (CLOSED) .NET Questions (CLOSED) TechInterview.org CityDesk FogBugz Fog Creek Copilot The Old Forum Your hosts: Albert D. Kallal Li-Fan Chen Stephen Jones |
For shared or cubicle office, what do you think is the minimum of network printer to person ratio? Should every printing station provide 2 printers: b/w and color?
Office manager Friday, April 20, 2007
well that rather depends how much printing you do per person. also consider if your printing needs are evenly dispersed or bunched together e.g. always a mad rush at universities toward the end of the academic year. either way you are probably in best position to answer this, maybe measure some print queue times over a typical week etc.
jk Friday, April 20, 2007
I would think the minimum would be one printer per person. any more printers than that and the user would have to be printing multiple jobs at the same time. That is crazy!
Friday, April 20, 2007
It depends on how fast the printer is. 1 printer that prints crazy fast like 60 pages a minute is better than 10 printers that print 5 pages a minute (until the 1 printer breaks... but that is another story).
My final answer: It depends on how much printing is done, how fast the network is and how fast the printers print. If you have a line of cranky people at the printers all of the time, you need more or BETTER printers.
I forgot my posting name. Friday, April 20, 2007
67:1
57:1 53:1 That as a printer-to-person ratio is a little higher than I would have expected. I can find ways to make use of 25 printers, but 67? I guess I can work on printing out the entire Internet in book form like I've always been meaning to.
anon Friday, April 20, 2007
Man, I was about to tell you all we have 1:10 but I can see now that's grossly inadequate.
SumoRunner Friday, April 20, 2007
Take what you have and see how people gather. If the crowd is too big, add another printer in another area handy for those using it. Repeat until you reach a reasonable flow.
Then do a printer and head count.
NameYouSee Friday, April 20, 2007
In many developing countries, one job responsiblity of a department manager is to ensure that the toner is not used up too quickly. The whole floor (~200) shares a printer.
There is a company here in Arizona that strives for a 1:1 ratio. That's right, everyone gets their own computer/laptop, and a $50-$150 ink jet printer. And the supply rooms are stocked with ink cartridges.
In the past, when one went down, then 25-50 people couldn't print, which I guess was a disaster. Also, since the personal printer was so small and slow, people printed out less. Additionally, when people complained of printing problems, then the "IT guy" would just swap it with an identical model in about 5 minutes. I haven't seen a copier tech fix anything in 5 minutes. Scary, but true. Dons flame suit, Zumbas
Depends on :
- How many people have computers - How much does each one print, some users may need a personal printer. Here's a setup I have seen in one location: 50 users share a printer (HPLJ5100tn), another 6 share a printer (HPLJ5100n), and 3 have their own personal printers (HPLJ24XXd).
Mad abour Printers Friday, April 20, 2007
So the better question is, how much "paper" do you need to process on a daily basis?
Between the high cost of toner and ink cartridges, and our desire to be environmentally friendly, we've made a concious effort to minimize our use of paper. We refrain from printing handouts for meetings, we print double sided, we recyle paper if we can (make notes on the back of prior printouts), two or four "pages" to each side of a sheet of paper if appropriate, and even have a dedicated, efficiency-minded printing and copying facility for bulk jobs. We have maybe 1 printer for every 150 people and I very rarely ever have to wait at the local printer for my job. Then again, I've been places where the ratio was 15:1 and there were still lines and queues because they insisted on printing everything.
TheDavid Friday, April 20, 2007
The receptionist emailed a new building telephone list this morning which I like to tape up next to my phone, so my use for a printer this week was exactly 2 pages. This is fairly typical for me. Some people might do as much as 2 or 4 pages a day.
SumoRunner Friday, April 20, 2007
SumoRunner,
Get out of the ston eage, that's what Outlook or an Intranet are for, just search. I've implemented 3 phone directories in my career, each one was hailed for their simplicity (can search by name, dept, phone number, building, etc). Even better when you use an IE shortcut and in your URL window I just type "phone fred" and I get all the Freds or "phone fred it" for Freds in IT.
So how do you look up the phone number of the Network Engineer when your network goes down?
It sounded stupid when they first handed them out, but now I appreciate the simplicity of mouse pads with our technical support department's phone number printed on them.
TheDavid Friday, April 20, 2007
Obviously depends on the line of business. One per office, which can be anything from one per person to one per ten people.
With electronic communication there is not going to be a great deal of printing so costs of material are not too important a factor compared to the inconvenience of having to go and pick up print jobs.
We are at 1:15, but it has more to do with location that the number of people. People only complain about walking to a printer, never about waiting for a printout.
Jim Friday, April 20, 2007
0:1 Just go out and buy a 100 dollar Brother laser printer and plomp it on your desk.
old.fart Friday, April 20, 2007
> In the past, when one went down, then 25-50 people couldn't print, which I guess was a disaster.
If people are printing constantly, fine. If not, then 2 printers for those 25-50 people are fine, because it doesn't take long to go and buy another backup when the first fails and you switch to the backup. Sunday, April 22, 2007 |
|
Powered by FogBugz


