A former community discussing the business of software, from the smallest shareware operation to Microsoft. A part of Joel on Software.
We're closed, folks!
Doug Nebeker ("Doug")
We are working on an idea for a smartphone app that would scan QR codes as one of several ways of inputting data (the QR code would cause the app to query the server for the data).
Are general (i.e., non-technical) users of smartphone very willing to scan QR codes? Are scan rates high or low for places where QR codes are displayed such as magazines, websites, and product packaging? Are QR codes currently increasing in popularity or decreasing in popularity?
Thank you for your help in making me better informed on this topic.
There have been a few scare stories recently about QR codes sending people to dodgy websites (e.g. loaded with malware). Don't know how much of an issue that it really, but perceptions are important.
Wednesday, February 06, 2013
Andy, I saw that to, where posters advertising stuff had QR codes on them, but someone had covered the code up with their own QR code that sent people somewhere dubious.
I guess putting the codes in a printed book, magazine, newspaper or flyer is okay, but not on posters, billboards, etc.
As an aside, it is a nice hack and it shows initiative, although the owners of these adverts were rightly underwhelmed.
too, not to. Doh!
[10+ years and still no edit function]
Also, in my experience barcode readers/qr code scanners on phones/tablets are incredible. I use an app called MyFitnessPal and the tablet version allows you to scan the barcode for a new food to quickly get the nutritional information into the system. It has been a huge help! They do not have any such feature for the website and you have to manually look up the food which is annoying as hell.
@Bring back anon
It is a bit strong to brand people as morons when the QR codes have been sabotaged.
Yeah I had not heard of the fake website stickers but now that I have this was my thought process:
1. Wow that's a clever way to inject malware.
2. Guess I'll never be scanning a QR code then if the only option is to go to the link without a chance to review it first.
Ok, so what you're saying is the following sequence occurs:
1. Someone replaces a QR code on some ad for Microsoft with their own sticker going to www.malware.ch
2. Unsuspecting, you pull out your phone and scan the code. Your scanner tells you that the QR code takes you to www.malware.ch. In plain URL-speak.
3. You go anyway.
It's phishing but for QR codes. It's the same logic and yeah, I think you're a moron if you fall for it.
If you've never used a QR code scanner, I can understand why you think I'd be harsh but the ones I've used definitely give you a chance to review before executing on the data contained in the QR code.
Incidentally, I came across an article titled "9 marketing strategies you must stop using - now" yesterday, and QR codes are #1 on the author's list:
Dmitry Leskov @Home
Thursday, February 07, 2013
Interesting link Dmitry, I was also puzzled a bit by #2, "Keyword-based search engine optimization". Then I realized that whenever I use a device that I've accessed GMail or any other Google service with, searches are done with HTTPS (because I've been automatically logged in). So almost all of my searches don't provide useful information to referrer logs.
Which opens a whole new can of worms. If your referrer logs don't provide you with the information you need, what do you do? Trust Google to properly price keywords? (They can call it bidding, but when the bidder has no information, I call it pricing). As the linked article suggests, maybe it's time to rely on organic search results and do a better job of keeping visitors interested.
Which leads me to think Google is shooting itself in the foot. But then it seems that Google is the prime example of a successful company that is clueless about marketing, but built a product so closely aligned to what its customers really wanted, that any scheme to monetize it would be successful.
I also find #2 on that list odd, I get that on site seo is rarely enough; but not making sure your pages are optimised at a basic level sounds like seo suicide.
Seriously - checking your desired keywords are in your title tags and h1's doesn't make you a spammer.
Friday, February 08, 2013
This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.Other recent topics
Powered by FogBugz